Los Angeles Mayor-elect Eric Garcetti probably could have won his election last month even if he hadn’t racked up huge majorities in Westchester.
Posts Tagged ‘Westchester’
LAX-area residents have high hopes for incoming L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti
June 16, 2013 at 6:00 pmStarline Tours Launches New Route From LAX To Santa Monica
June 15, 2013 at 7:45 amStarline Tours recently expanded its CitySightseeing
service from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) area hotels to Santa
Monica via Fisherman’s Village.
A ribbon
cutting ceremony was held last Thursday to celebrate the new route made
possible by a partnership with Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. and Santa Monica
Place.
Representatives from Starline Tours, Santa Monica Place, Downtown Santa
Monica, the City of Santa Monica, Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce and Santa
Monica Convention & Visitors Bureau (SMCVB) came together as the “first
bus” drove through to break the ribbon.
“With the addition of these new routes,
Starline Tours’ coverage expands to more than 100 miles of touring routes,
making it the world’s largest CitySightseeing Hop-On Hop-Off City Tour,” said
Philip Ferentinos, Director of Starline Tours.
City of Los Angeles to open its swimming pools for the summer
June 14, 2013 at 6:01 pmEveryone in the pool. It’s time for the city of Los Angeles to open its pools for the summer season, adding roughly three dozen swim facilities to the 16 pools open year round.
LADWP urges customers to conserve water
June 8, 2013 at 8:35 pmAfter another dry winter, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power officials on Friday reminded customers that drought water conservation measures remain in effect — including odd-even watering days and reductions in water use.
Los Angeles residents urged to conserve water following dry winter
June 7, 2013 at 9:10 pmLos Angeles water department officials urged residents Friday to conserve water this summer because of record-low deliveries from the Los Angeles Aqueduct and a greater than normal reliance on purchased water projected for the upcoming year.
Bolivian man stopped at LAX with knife in shoe
June 5, 2013 at 9:55 pmA Bolivian man tried to enter the gate area Tuesday at Los Angeles International Airport with a knife hidden under the sole of his shoe, officials said.
One of Medicare’s most-wanted fugitives is arrested at LAX
June 3, 2013 at 8:35 pmOne of Medicare’s most-wanted fugitives, a former clinic owner in the Los Angeles area, was arrested on his return from South Korea, authorities said.
Starline Tours Launches LAX To Santa Monica Route
June 2, 2013 at 6:10 pmA ribbon cutting ceremony will be held Thursday morning to launch Starline Tour’s recently expanded CitySightseeing service from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) area hotels to Santa Monica via Fisherman’s Village in partnership with Downtown Sa…
Volunteers step up to help with Westchester Rotary’s latest home makeover
June 1, 2013 at 11:40 amThe front yard of the home on 82nd Street in Westchester was just a blanket of dirt after workers tore out overgrown weeds and bushes earlier this week.
Electric cars are getting as cheap as gasoline rivals
June 1, 2013 at 7:29 amThe Times test drives the Nissan Leaf, Fiat 500e and Honda Fit EV to see how they stack up in the race to go green.What would it take to get you into an electric car today?
Mayor-Elect Garcetti Faces Controversial LAX Runway Project
May 31, 2013 at 9:34 pmLOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — One major issue on mayor-elect Eric Garcetti’s agenda is a controversial runway project at Los Angeles International Airport.
The Los Angeles City Council approved the $4.76 billion project on April 30, which is intended to upgrade the airport’s layout to accommodate larger aircraft, such as the Airbus A380.
During his mayoral campaign, Garcetti told the council he’s dead set against the plan, which pleased community activists like Denny Schneider.
Schneider said the expansion would be a disaster for the community of Westchester, which borders the airport.
“Those planes are going to be coming within feet of people’s windows and I don’t know about you, but when I see a plane that size, coming that close, I get concerned. Not even just for the fact that all the pollution is coming into their lungs, but just the safety of it,” he said.
Business leaders, however, said the improvements will be a step in the right direction.
“We think that when mayor-elect Garcetti actually assumes office, he will be thinking about the economic vitality and what’s best for all 4 million residents of the city of Los Angeles. I think he’ll have to take another look at this particular project,” said Gary Toebben, the president of the L.A. Area Chamber of Commerce.
The city council votes on the plan again in June.
The issue could be made final before Garcetti takes office on July 1.
RELATED STORIES:
Airport Workers To Challenge LAX’s Runway Expansion Plan
City Council OKs $4B LAX Runway Expansion Proposal
City Council OKs $4B LAX Runway Expansion Proposal
Residents Sound Off On Proposed LAX Runway Move
" addthis:title="Mayor-Elect Garcetti Faces Controversial LAX Runway Project" addthis:description="LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — One major issue on mayor-elect Eric Garcetti’s agenda is a controversial runway project at Los Angeles International Airport.
The Los Angeles City Council approved the $4.76 billion project on April 30, which is intended to upgrade the airport’s layout to accommodate larger aircraft, such as the Airbus A380.
During his mayoral campaign, Garcetti told the council he’s dead set against the plan, which pleased community activists like Denny Schneider.
Schneider said the expansion would be a disaster for the community of Westchester, which borders the airport.
“Those planes are going to be coming within feet of people’s windows and I don’t know about you, but when I see a plane that size, coming that close, I get concerned. Not even just for the fact that all the pollution is coming into their lungs, but just the safety of it,” he said.
Business leaders, however, said the improvements will be a step in the right direction.
“We think that when mayor-elect Garcetti actually assumes office, he will be thinking about the economic vitality and what’s best for all 4 million residents of the city of Los Angeles. I think he’ll have to take another look at this particular project,” said Gary Toebben, the president of the L.A. Area Chamber of Commerce.
The city council votes on the plan again in June.
The issue could be made final before Garcetti takes office on July 1.
RELATED STORIES:
Airport Workers To Challenge LAX’s Runway Expansion Plan
City Council OKs $4B LAX Runway Expansion Proposal
Residents Sound Off On Proposed LAX Runway Move
">Shared Solar Bills Pass California Senate, Assembly
May 31, 2013 at 3:10 pmThis is getting real, folks. California legislators voted this week to advance two different bills that open up access to solar to the 75+ percent of energy customers who can’t put it on their own roof. Here’s the skinny on the two bills and what we need you to do to make sure shared solar becomes a reality in California this legislative session.
Senate Bill 43, authored by longtime solar champion Senator Lois Wolk, creates a 500MW pilot program that would enable customers of PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E to sign up to participate in shared renewable energy facilities, and receive a credit on their utility bill for the energy produced by their share of the project. SB 43 was approved by the California Senate Thursday on a 27-9 vote.
Assembly Bill 1014, authored by Assemblyman Das Williams, builds off a settlement agreement currently before the CPUC to create a “Green Option” tariff program, which was negotiated this spring between investor-owned utility PG&E, ratepayer advocates, environmental advocates, and unions. AB 1014 expands this program to the state’s two other major utilities: SCE and SDG&E. AB 1014 was approved by the Assembly Friday on a 55-17 vote.
Vote Solar has been working with a broad coalition of allies to support the bills’ passage (see our coalition website here), and we’re thrilled to have reached this milestone. Now we’ve got to keep the pressure on to make sure we get the best possible outcome as these bills continue to move through the legislature. There are a couple key provisions at stake:
1. Letting the market innovate. SB 43 allows organizations developing shared renewable energy projects to interface directly with customers; they could market their projects to customers and charge them for their share of the clean energy generation. AB 1014 puts the utility in the middle of this transaction, so that customers pay the utility for clean energy at a set rate, and the utility in turn buys the energy from developers. This limits the ability of the market to innovate and create offerings tailored to customer interests, whether it be specific project locations, technologies, or financing needs. We believe AB 1014 should, at minimum, contain provisions that allow the market to innovate within the green tariff to meet customer desires, so more people buy in, and we get more clean energy powering our homes and businesses, faster.
2. Making sure customers get a fair deal. Whether it’s the utility or a third party that’s signing contracts with consumers, we have to make sure that the terms of those deals provide a fair value for the clean energy generation. SB 43 proposes to accomplish this by asking the Public Utilities Commission to do a cost-benefit analysis and determine what the renewable energy is worth, then participants’ bill credit equal to that value – pretty straightforward. AB 1014 adopts the credits and charges for participants outlined in the PG&E-TURN proposed settlement, which include benefits of renewables as the CPUC determines them but also includes departing load charges that customers would have to pay in order to participate in shared renewable energy projects. We’ll need to stay vigilant as these bills move forward to ensure the provisions around pricing are fair to consumers.
Getting the specifics of the policy design right will be critical, or course, for creating a healthy, well-functioning shared renewables market in California. But we are on the brink of a major step: allowing thousands of Californians who can’t put renewables on their own property – renters, businesses, schools, churches, the military, public agencies – to invest in more clean energy for the first time. The momentum in the Legislature shows that shared renewable energy is a truly an idea whose time has come. Maybe that’s because it’s common sense – give Californians more control over their individual energy choices, create new jobs in an industry that’s here to stay, bring more clean energy to our communities. Win-win-win.
To learn more about shared renewable energy projects and policies across the country, visit www.sharedrenewables.org .
1. Letting the market innovate. SB 43 allows organizations developing shared renewable energy projects to interface directly with customers; they could market their projects to customers and charge them for their share of the clean energy generation. AB 1014 puts the utility in the middle of this transaction, so that customers pay the utility for clean energy at a set rate, and the utility in turn buys the energy from developers. This limits the ability of the market to innovate and create offerings tailored to customer interests, whether it be specific project locations, technologies, or financing needs. We believe AB 1014 should, at minimum, contain provisions that allow the market to innovate within the green tariff to meet customer desires, so more people buy in, and we get more clean energy powering our homes and businesses, faster.
2. Making sure customers get a fair deal. Whether it’s the utility or a third party that’s signing contracts with consumers, we have to make sure that the terms of those deals provide a fair value for the clean energy generation. SB 43 proposes to accomplish this by asking the Public Utilities Commission to do a cost-benefit analysis and determine what the renewable energy is worth, then participants’ bill credit equal to that value – pretty straightforward. AB 1014 adopts the credits and charges for participants outlined in the PG&E-TURN proposed settlement, which include benefits of renewables as the CPUC determines them but also includes departing load charges that customers would have to pay in order to participate in shared renewable energy projects. We’ll need to stay vigilant as these bills move forward to ensure the provisions around pricing are fair to consumers.
Getting the specifics of the policy design right will be critical, or course, for creating a healthy, well-functioning shared renewables market in California. But we are on the brink of a major step: allowing thousands of Californians who can’t put renewables on their own property – renters, businesses, schools, churches, the military, public agencies – to invest in more clean energy for the first time. The momentum in the Legislature shows that shared renewable energy is a truly an idea whose time has come. Maybe that’s because it’s common sense – give Californians more control over their individual energy choices, create new jobs in an industry that’s here to stay, bring more clean energy to our communities. Win-win-win.
To learn more about shared renewable energy projects and policies across the country, visit www.sharedrenewables.org .
" addthis:title="Shared Solar Bills Pass California Senate, Assembly" addthis:description="
This is getting real, folks. California legislators voted this week to advance two different bills that open up access to solar to the 75+ percent of energy customers who can’t put it on their own roof. Here’s the skinny on the two bills and what we need you to do to make sure shared solar becomes a reality in California this legislative session.
Senate Bill 43, authored by longtime solar champion Senator Lois Wolk, creates a 500MW pilot program that would enable customers of PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E to sign up to participate in shared renewable energy facilities, and receive a credit on their utility bill for the energy produced by their share of the project. SB 43 was approved by the California Senate Thursday on a 27-9 vote.
Assembly Bill 1014, authored by Assemblyman Das Williams, builds off a settlement agreement currently before the CPUC to create a “Green Option” tariff program, which was negotiated this spring between investor-owned utility PG&E, ratepayer advocates, environmental advocates, and unions. AB 1014 expands this program to the state’s two other major utilities: SCE and SDG&E. AB 1014 was approved by the Assembly Friday on a 55-17 vote.
Vote Solar has been working with a broad coalition of allies to support the bills’ passage (see our coalition website here), and we’re thrilled to have reached this milestone. Now we’ve got to keep the pressure on to make sure we get the best possible outcome as these bills continue to move through the legislature. There are a couple key provisions at stake:
1. Letting the market innovate. SB 43 allows organizations developing shared renewable energy projects to interface directly with customers; they could market their projects to customers and charge them for their share of the clean energy generation. AB 1014 puts the utility in the middle of this transaction, so that customers pay the utility for clean energy at a set rate, and the utility in turn buys the energy from developers. This limits the ability of the market to innovate and create offerings tailored to customer interests, whether it be specific project locations, technologies, or financing needs. We believe AB 1014 should, at minimum, contain provisions that allow the market to innovate within the green tariff to meet customer desires, so more people buy in, and we get more clean energy powering our homes and businesses, faster.
2. Making sure customers get a fair deal. Whether it’s the utility or a third party that’s signing contracts with consumers, we have to make sure that the terms of those deals provide a fair value for the clean energy generation. SB 43 proposes to accomplish this by asking the Public Utilities Commission to do a cost-benefit analysis and determine what the renewable energy is worth, then participants’ bill credit equal to that value – pretty straightforward. AB 1014 adopts the credits and charges for participants outlined in the PG&E-TURN proposed settlement, which include benefits of renewables as the CPUC determines them but also includes departing load charges that customers would have to pay in order to participate in shared renewable energy projects. We’ll need to stay vigilant as these bills move forward to ensure the provisions around pricing are fair to consumers.
Getting the specifics of the policy design right will be critical, or course, for creating a healthy, well-functioning shared renewables market in California. But we are on the brink of a major step: allowing thousands of Californians who can’t put renewables on their own property – renters, businesses, schools, churches, the military, public agencies – to invest in more clean energy for the first time. The momentum in the Legislature shows that shared renewable energy is a truly an idea whose time has come. Maybe that’s because it’s common sense – give Californians more control over their individual energy choices, create new jobs in an industry that’s here to stay, bring more clean energy to our communities. Win-win-win.
To learn more about shared renewable energy projects and policies across the country, visit www.sharedrenewables.org .
">









